Yeshivat Kerem B'Yavneh

You will eat, be satisfied, and bless Hashem

BackBack to Main Page

By: Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut

(Translated by Rav Meir Orlian)

Our parsha describes the worthy qualities of Eretz Yisrael (Devarim 8:7-10):

For Hashem, your G-d, is bringing you to a good Land: a land with streams of water, of springs and underground water coming forth in valley and mountains ... a Land of wheat, barley, grape, fig, and pomegranate; a Land of oil-olives and date-honey ... You will eat and you will be satisfied, and bless Hashem, your G-d, for the good Land that He gave you.

Chazal learn from here the law of birchat hamazon from the Torah. There are four blessings, in which we thank G-d for food, the Land of Israel, the future rebuilding of Yerushalayim, and the blessing of thanks, and we also mention the Exodus, matan Torah and brit milah. Furthermore, when three people eat together they are obligated in zimun.

In contrast to birchat hamazon, al hamichya is a short bracha that we bless when eating of the seven species in which Eretz Yisrael is blessed (including mezonot and wine): "a Land of wheat, barley, grape, fig, and pomegranate; a Land of oil-olives and date-honey." In it we mention the Land and Yerushalayim, but don't mention matan Torah and brit milah, and there is no law of zimun.

What is the reason for the halachic difference between them? The Shulchan Aruch (29:3) writes that "You will eat and you will be satisfied, and bless Hashem," relates to bread alone and not to other things. What is the idea inherent in this difference?

Rav J.B. Soloveitchik zt"l writes: There is a big difference between the creation of a fruit and the creation of bread. In creating fruit – man's input is minimal. The fruit is formed by itself naturally, it develops by itself and matures by itself. Man's role is just to pick and eat the fruit; G-d provides the person with the fruit full and ready.

In contrast to the fruit, bread does not grow on trees. Man needs to plant and reap, thresh, select, grint, sift, knead and bake, as Chazal say (Brachot 58a):

How many toils did Adam Harishon toil until he found bread to eat! He plowed, planted and reaped, piled, threshed, winnowed, selected and ground, sifted and baked, and then ate.

If so, man is a full partner with G-d in creating bread.

Man's role in preparing fuit, on the one hand, and his role in forming bread, on the other, are similar to two kinds of intervention by G-d in the world. One kind is help, and the other kind is salvation. In salvation man does not do anything; everything comes from G-d, as it says, "The salvation of Hashem in the blink of an eye. This is set aside for G-d alone. Not so help – man is active, and G-d helps him and succeeds his activity; G-d is man's partner in his activity.

The formation of a fruit is similar to salvation. Everything is done by G-d without man's input in its formation, unlike the creation of bread, which is like help. G-d helps man in growing wheat, but man done all the actions. Man needs G-d's help for it to succeed, but he creates everything; Hashem just provides assistance.

Based on this we understand the difference between the long birchat hamazon and the short al hamichya.

Birchat Hamazon is said for eating bread: "You will eat and you will be satisfied, and bless Hashem," because we thank Hashem for man's ability to be G-d's partner in the work of Creation. Man needs to thank for this help, more than for the formation of the fruit, which is entirely salvation and comes from G-d. There the bracha is shorter, because there is no partnership of man in creation.

Something similar we find in the difference between splitting the Red Sea and the Exodus. The Exodus was entirely by G-d: "I, and not an angel," unlike the splitting the Red Sea – there was input of Am Yisrael in the redemption: Speak to Bnei Yisrael and they should travel." G-d asked of Am Yisrael to jump into the sea even before it split. Through this they were partners of G-d in the redemption and this is the reason that at the Red Sea Am Yisrael opened with song: "Then Moshe and Bnei Yisrael sand this song," because Am Yisarel was a full partner in the redemption. Not so the Exodus – neither Moshe nor Bnei Yisrael sang song, because the Exodus was a full salvation, everything was from G-d.

This shows that the purpose of the creation is the partnership between man and G-d, and for this the thanks to G-d is greater.

Shiur ID: 3855

Scan to load the shiur on the KBY website:

 

 

Do you have a comment or question on the shiur?
Comment below and we'll join the discussion

Add your comments:




Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע K
Rav Netanel Berkovitz
Rav Netanel Berkovitz
ע
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
Rav Zechariah Tubi, Rosh Kollel Rabbanut
ע
Rosh Hayeshiva, Harav Mordechai Greenberg
Rosh Hayeshiva, Harav Mordechai Greenberg
ע K
Rav Ori Betzalel Fisher
Rav Ori Betzalel Fisher
ע
Rav Aryeh Stern
Rav Aryeh Stern
ע
Rav Meir Orlian
Rav Meir Orlian
ע
הרב אביגדור שילה
ע K